1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Afterlife Forums is an online, interactive community designed to give seekers direct access to prominent researchers, to afterlife literature, and to one another in order to foster both spiritual growth and public interest in life after death.

close to home

Discussion in 'General Afterlife Discussions' started by mac, Jun 25, 2018.

  1. mac

    mac senior member Staff Member

    Elsewhere we're discussing belief compared with evidence/proof and how they differ.

    It struck me that we have on ALF some very good practical examples, members who may consider their experiences as proof of survival and life beyond death - even if they don't speak of it that way and don't expect others to be persuaded.

    Here are just a few examples. One member had a vivid NDE that left her in no doubt about continued life in the world of the spirit and her continuing connection to spirit helpers she met during the brief time she spent there. Another is bereaved yet tells of his continuing communications with his beloved wife. And a bereaved mother became re-united with her lost son and learned how to communicate with him. Additionally we should not forget that this website's owner is guided by the spirit of none other than Thomas Jefferson and she has been inspired to write numerous books about afterlife issues as a consequence of her trans-dimensional communications.

    Others have experienced, and may continue to experience, signs and symbols so strong and evidential that they, too, are convinced.

    Would it be fair or respectful to suggest that the conviction, the certainty about survival, experienced by individual members such as these is simply their belief?
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2018
    Kurt and SashaS like this.
  2. RobertaGrimes

    RobertaGrimes Administrator

    Dear Mac, I guess I am impatient at this point with the word "belief." It implies a personal conviction only, and one that could be entirely idiosyncratic, based on no evidence at all. Would we say that the passage of time is a "belief," or light, or the apparent solidity of matter? No. We consider time, light, and solid matter to be aspects of an objective reality: we believe they have been proven to be real. And yet, they are not objectively real at all! They are aspects of this material universe, which even scientists know is less than five percent of what we can demonstrate exists. Time, physical light, and solid matter have no existence in most of reality. On the other hand, the things we talk about here - the energy levels of the afterlife, the primacy of consciousness, the eternal existence of the human mind, and so on - in fact do exist EVERYWHERE. So to talk about them as mere beliefs simply because mainstream science remains stubbornly ignorant seems wrong, don't you think? And when someone experiences aspects of the eternal reality that afterlife researchers can now objectively support - a NDE, for example, or a communication from a loved one - then their certainty about their experience is no more a mere belief than flicking a light switch produces a mere belief in light. Sooner or later, we are going to have to swallow hard and say that when individuals experience common aspects of the greater reality that we now know exists, that is indeed a real experience!
    Janet and Widdershins3 like this.
  3. mac

    mac senior member Staff Member

    I get impatient too, Roberta, but when individuals are told of our conviction, of our total certainty and why but still equate that to 'belief' whadya do? I've tried my best to explain what I mean but failed.
  4. jimrich

    jimrich Active Member

    For me, what you are speaking of is "judgement" or evaluation, so, if someone does not or cannot accept that I have had several direct and personal experiences with Disincarnates, they are free to judge, label or "see" it anyway they wish. I'd prefer a skeptic simply say they don't believe me ("I don't believe or like that!") rather than rudely pass judgements such as: "Oh, that's just your belief!" But no matter what someone says about my reality/experiences, I am still left with accepting and honoring my own reality/truths so.........to each their own. Diss me if you must but have the courage to express your own thoughts/feelings/beliefs with an "I" statement such as "I think you're crazy." etc.
    I do not "get impatient" since healthy self esteem and self respect is all I need to handle the judgements, criticism and HATRED coming from frightened skeptics. History has shown over and over how harshly judged and even murdered individuals were proven right long after the skeptics disposed of them (Jesus?) Sorry but I have no "evidence" whatsoever to offer regarding my experiences and contacts with Disindarnates and Heaven. Oh well............
  5. mac

    mac senior member Staff Member

    Individuals will do that anyway, without your setting them free to do it.

    Why is it that rudely passing judgements when in your earlier paragraph you just wrote that "...they are free to judge, label or see it anyway they wish."?

    Although they may not agree with what another thinks or says folk do not necessarily think someone is crazy to behave the way they do. But some may still see personal conviction born of experience as 'belief' and it's that issue that was the central forum topic.

    You don't engage here very often about general issues, mostly it's about your personal experiences and situation. I don't know what you experience elsewhere but here on ALF you certainly don't face judgements, criticism or HATRED (sic) from frightened skeptics.

    This thread isn't about skepticism. It was intended to reflect upon the reasons that personal conviction about survival et al is different from belief. You are someone who has had, and presumably still has, just such experiences and are totally convinced by that and other experience. Yours is not belief.

Share This Page