1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Afterlife Forums is an online, interactive community designed to give seekers direct access to prominent researchers, to afterlife literature, and to one another in order to foster both spiritual growth and public interest in life after death.

Andrew's Sessions with the North American Station

Discussion in 'Instrumental TransCommunication with Stations' started by Andrew, May 30, 2016.

  1. Andrew

    Andrew Guest


    Here's another session from almost a week ago--I've been a tad bit behind with analyzing my ITC sessions this week. This is the first session of mine that uses the new, refined gibberish file that Craig sent all the researchers last weekend, and that seems to have made quite a difference. In my estimation, this recording has some of the clearest responses I've received! This session doesn't include any attempts to communicate with particular people; I just asked the team at the North American Station to repeat several words and to answer a couple of questions.
  2. Andrew

    Andrew Guest


    This session from June 9 is also pretty clear in my opinion, but perhaps not quite as clear as the recording from June 6. In this recording, I asked the team at the North American Station to repeat some words and to answer some general-knowledge questions, and I then spoke briefly with my great-grandmother. I think the last section, which uses the female gibberish since I'm speaking with my great-grandmother, is remarkably clear!
  3. RobertaGrimes

    RobertaGrimes Administrator

    Wow, that's great! And you're communicating with some out-of-this-world-class folks ;-).
  4. Andrew

    Andrew Guest


    This is the first English-language ITC session I've recorded using my new microphone and speaker set. I think that the new equipment has improved the quality somewhat, but I'll be curious to hear what all of you think. In this session, I didn't attempt to contact any specific person; rather, I just did some quick word repetitions and general-knowledge questions to help the team at the Station to hone their signal. In my opinion, the clearest responses are "pigment" and "Merkel."

    (Note: Merkel is pronounced like "mur-kel" in the responses, which is how most English speakers seem to say it. I speak German, and so I always pronounce it more like "mair-kel," and I was surprised to hear the anglicized pronunciation. I see this as yet another sort of proof that I'm not just hearing the responses I'm looking for in the recordings.)
  5. Andrew

    Andrew Guest


    Here's a quick session I did earlier today with the North American Station. I need to get back to doing more in-depth sessions, but lately I've been focusing my energy mainly on connecting with the Brazilian Station. This session wasn't the clearest, in my opinion, but I think some of the responses were pretty good quality. "German" and "Newton" especially struck me as being very precise, if that makes sense.
  6. RobertaGrimes

    RobertaGrimes Administrator

    They're getting clearer - this is exciting!

    I think it's important here to remind everyone of the process that is now underway, and why this is so difficult. I'll just recount a bit of what I know; others who know more are welcome to chime in! Until now, electronic communication with the dead was not very different from mediumistic communication, in that it was one-off stuff - a group of the dead developing good contacts with certain living people who were simpatico with them - and nothing that you or I could really do. This sort of communication continues under the leadership of Tom and Lisa Butler, who are doing wonderful work! But while it is satisfying for the individuals involved, the dead now feel that it doesn't do enough to advance the general public awareness that we all survive. So now dead experts - and the dead are always the leaders in this work - are doing something very ambitious. They are building a series of what they call Stations.

    Timestream - or Rio de Tiempo - is the oldest Station of which I am aware, dating from the nineties (or even the eighties - doesn't matter). It uses primarily Portuguese. Then, early in this century, the dead began to experiment with better technology on their end through the Brazilian Station, which we have been told is a physical station located higher in the afterlife levels. Sonia Rinaldi is working with them from this end, and by now they are getting such wonderful, clear communications that dead children and their parents are communicating routinely through the Brazilian Station. Very recently Maria Pe, an American whose young sons have been working hard to communicate with her, received clear communications through that station that were in English.

    Stations have language lexicons, though, and Sonia was told that her Station couldn't really help English-speakers very well and what was needed was a separate North American Station. So two years ago our indomitable friend Craig Hogan volunteered to assist with this new English-speaking Station. Dead experimenters who include such brilliant scientific types as Einstein and Tesla have been busy building what we are told is the largest and most ambitious Station so far. The idea is to build a communication method between there and here that is "hard-wired" - they liken it to laying fiber-optic cable - and to make it so strong and so reliable that eventually anyone on earth will be able to communicate with dead loved ones simply by using perhaps an app. It will become like telephonic communication! Now the dead are saying that the "electronics" from their end are all set up, and what is needed is many people accessing the North American Station to make the signal stronger. And that is what Andrew is doing here, together with dozens of other people. It isn't about what he is receiving now, in other words, but it's about assisting the dead experts in building the signal-strength of the NA Station to the point where it will be usable by all. If you want to assist in this effort, your help is welcome! Go to spiritualunderstanding.org and you'll find the instructions for connecting. Craig is personally assisting all the experimenters. You, too, can be a part of helping the future to at last begin!
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2016
  7. Andrew

    Andrew Guest

    I've been using better recording equipment for the last few sessions--that could be why. But I've been told that the quality will be equivalent to that of the Brazilian Station by January, so we're not far away!

    I've just connected with Timestream Station this morning, and I've created a new thread for my sessions with that station. They come through about as clearly as the Brazilian Station does, only with a distinct European accent.
  8. RobertaGrimes

    RobertaGrimes Administrator

    Heh - You don't think of people without physical bodies and living where there is no distance actually still having regional accents, do you??
  9. Andrew

    Andrew Guest

    I don't think the dead at Timestream Station actually have regional accents. European Portuguese follows different pronunciation rules than its Brazilian counterpart does--it's not the same as British versus American English; it's much starker--so I'm guessing that these differences are automatically included in the two lexicons that the Portuguese-speaking stations use.
  10. Andrew

    Andrew Guest


    I finally managed to find a little free time yesterday to conduct a session with the North American Station--well, sessions are actually very short; it's shifting through the recording and making the videos that takes a decent chunk of time. In any case, here is the result. I was told that I was speaking with Marie Curie, which is interesting because she has never, to my knowledge, been referenced as one of the researchers at the station. This sort of work does, however, sound like something she would be doing! To me, "American" sounds like the clearest response from this session, and "Theresa" seems to be the faintest. I'll be curious to hear others' thoughts.

    I also found the message about communicating with the future to be rather curious. When I asked whether such communication was possible, I received, "Don't. You're in above your head." I assume that "you" refers to those who would attempt to talk with the future rather than me personally--I have no interest in that particular type of ITC, but I did wonder if it was possible after the topic arose here recently. (This particular wording is also interesting on a linguistic level, because I usually say "over your head" not "above," although both are documented forms of the same idiom.)
  11. Andrew

    Andrew Guest


    I had several communication sessions with the North American Station this week, and I discovered some very interesting things! In this session, I asked some general questions about ITC. Out of mere curiosity, or so I thought, I asked whether there was a Mandarin-language station. Mandarin is the most widely-spoken language in the world, and so I figured that there might well be a station devoted to Chinese communication already. Much to my surprise, I received a short, clear response in Chinese from the North American Station: 为儿子, or "for our sons." This was followed by "You're going to help."

    Now, less than a week later, I am indeed in the process of helping the discarnate researchers establish a Chinese-language station, with Craig's guidance. Spirit has even led me to a native speaker in China who is interested in the process and who is helping me to translate. There is some other interesting information in this session, but this is simply amazing!
  12. Andrew

    Andrew Guest


    In this ITC, I asked some questions about the Chinese-language station that the discarnate researchers want to establish. I learned that it will be called the Beijing Station, which seems quite logical. ("Chinese" could refer to about a dozen different languages, but Mandarin is the regional dialect of the Beijing area.) I also confirmed that those at the station wanted my help in building this station.
  13. Andrew

    Andrew Guest


    Because my ITC recording from July 26 produced very faint responses, I wanted to confirm the information that was conveyed during that session before acting upon it. I contacted Marlene, a Brazilian woman who sometimes communicates with us from both the Brazilian and the North American Stations, and she told me exactly the same things about the Beijing Station that I had been told in the two previous sessions.

    I also asked some questions about the perception of earthly time in the afterlife. Essentially, Marlene said that they can see the earth's future from the Summerland, but that it is not a definite future--it's the most probable outcome based on the current path we are taking; it can be changed. She also gave me the current expected outcome of the American presidential election, as well as which parties will control the United States House of Representatives and the Senate after the 2016 elections. I asked for this information, because it will be easy to verify in the near future.

    (Warning: If you'd rather be surprised this November by the election results--even though these predictions are not definite, they are much more accurate than our earthly polling, I'm sure--then please skip this particular video.)
  14. ShingingLight1967

    ShingingLight1967 Active Member

    Hi Andrew...

    TBH.. out of every one of these, I think this was the clearest one of all for me to understand. I have taken to not watching the screen so I can see if I can pick up on anything.. and this one.. was the best for me.
  15. Andrew

    Andrew Guest

    Hi SL! I agree--this session was remarkably clear. When speaking with Marlene, we use a gibberish file that was created from a recording of her earth voice, and I find that the results are much better with that particular gibberish then with the generic female audio file. I don't know whether it is because Marlene herself feels a much stronger connection to her own voice, or whether there is some other advantage to this file, but it does seem to work quite well.
  16. ibelieve

    ibelieve New Member

    That was clear! And I hope it's wrong!
  17. TheEscapist

    TheEscapist New Member

    I went to watch your videos but it said no content was available. Could that be because I'm in Canada, or did you take them down?
  18. mac

    mac senior member Staff Member

    In my browser, pressing the play button yields: 'This video has been removed by the user' It looks like Andrew has decided to withdraw them, perhaps to add newer ones when he's experimented further....
  19. Annie

    Annie Member

    Ah shoot, the videos aren't available...curious if Marlene was correct in her predictions. This sounds like it would be really cool to listen to.
  20. pleiades

    pleiades Member

    I do remember that the Presidential prediction was Hillary Clinton and IMO, it was accurate since she did win the popular vote. :)
  21. mac

    mac senior member Staff Member

    I disagree but that's the wrong topic here anyway. Look at the forum's title please.....
  22. Arbutus Eric

    Arbutus Eric Member

    Gosh I was hoping Marlene's prediction would come true about the presidential elections. Evidently there was a change in trajectory. Any ideas why all the recording links are bad?
  23. mac

    mac senior member Staff Member

    Are they all bad? In what sense - they don't work you mean?
  24. RobertaGrimes

    RobertaGrimes Administrator

    Our wonderful Andrew has to take a break from this work sometimes, whenever his day-life overtakes him. I suspect that he took them down so he doesn't have to interact with people about them now, and also because he is going for better and clearer communications. I'm going to ask for others who also are working with the NA Station to come and post some of what they are getting!
  25. RobertaGrimes

    RobertaGrimes Administrator

    This is an interesting point! I think they're still sorting it out, but by strict vote-count it may be that Clinton does come in first. But under the U.S. Constitutional system it's the Electoral College that counts, and I think Marlene wasn't an American (could be wrong) so she might not have been aware of that?
  26. mac

    mac senior member Staff Member

    Doesn't it show just how inevitably ambiguous predictions of a future are - even those made by a discarnate? Knowing about the American electoral system of voting isn't a prerequisite if details of 'the future' were already established - and knowable - in advance of their taking place in earth time. If they were then all other our-future events must also be knowable. I suggest that's not the case.

    Why would a discarnate woman guess the likely outcome any better than an incarnate one EXCEPT that the former may glimpse a broader picture of what's been happening within the whole American nation, may have a better 'feel' for all the individual discontent that later became obvious. The depth of discontent discounted by politicians, pundits and pollsters alike? You may recall that our little nation experienced something similar when there was a virtually-unpredicted vote to leave the EU. (Didn't Michael Moore, though, predict what actually just happened here in America?)

    It's especially sad that the only contemporary contact we had with someone in the etheric world ended when Mikey Morgan and his mom, Carol, left this website. I wouldn't expect Mikey to know something that couldn't be known but it would have been illuminating to hear from him how he perceived world events from the realm where he lives and how he would have interpreted them. I would have taken more notice of his perspective than I would of discarnate individuals I'm unable to question and probe.

    We didn't see always eye-to-eye on matters, and I didn't automatically accept his opinions, but I never doubted what he told us of his experiences in the life yet-to-be-seen by ourselves.
  27. Arbutus Eric

    Arbutus Eric Member

    Yes, not one of them works anymore. They were fascinating and I'm looking forward to some new ones!
  28. mac

    mac senior member Staff Member

    I'd guess Andrew pulled them because they're out of date and because he had promised more and better are to follow around the new year.
  29. Annie

    Annie Member

    Yeah, it does bring into question how set-in-stone things are. I always figured it was nearly impossible to predict the future, even by those in spirit, but that they would be a heck of a lot better at it than we are. Like you said though, you would think maybe they would have access to things we don't. For example, polls being inaccurate, maybe because people didn't want to admit who they were really voting for, or something like that. But maybe they, like us, don't see everything going on. I always kind of thought it was easy for discarnate people to see and hear us, but maybe they only see/hear people they were connected to in life.

    Or maybe, like Roberta said, Marlene was technically right but didn't know much about the American electoral system. And didn't need to know, because by the time you pass on, you really aren't worried about politics or government anymore (which sounds pretty nice!).

    Also, hope Andrew is doing well.
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2016
  30. RobertaGrimes

    RobertaGrimes Administrator

    The dead tell us that they cannot predict the future, primarily because human free will can intervene. They can only "game out" from today what is likely to happen, and you're right: they are so much less interested in the things on this level that fascinate us!

Share This Page